Narrative reviews may discuss interdisciplinary areas of studies that are actively being researched or propose new interdisciplinary approaches across the loosely defined field of brain sciences. The prompt is intended to be interpreted very broadly; prospective entrants should not be very concerned about whether their paper idea qualifies. Entrants are especially encouraged to put ideas from the humanities and the sciences into conversation.
Example narrative review ideas include but are certainly not limited to: application of a philosophical theory towards the ethics of brain-computer interaction, approaches for computer science to further the field of linguistics, analysis of how journalism and literature influence society’s attitudes towards brain technologies, application of evolutionary biology experiment strategies to address reproducibility challenges in psychology research, and proposal for how qualitative psychology methods can be applied to develop more humanistic computer science.
The Spring 2026 Challenge will be judged by Dr. Eve Valera, Associate Professor of Psychiatry at Harvard Medical School. Dr. Valera uses a range of methodologies to understand the effects of brain injuries (from blunt force trauma as well as strangulation-related asphyxiation, "Concussion+") in women who have experienced intimate partner violence. As a pioneer in the field for over 25 years, Dr. Valera's work has provided much of the minimal data linking partner inflicted brain injuries to negative cognitive, psychological and neural outcomes.
The top three winning entries will be published in the Spring 2026 issue of The Harvard Brain alongside research from affiliates of Harvard University.
The deadline to submit to the Spring 2026 Challenge is April 13, 2026 at 11:59 PM EST. (Not ready to submit yet? Sign up for email reminders before the deadline here.)